Cheap The Civil War - A Film by Ken Burns (DVD) (Ken Burns) Price

Related Products

Customer Reviews of The Civil War - A Film by Ken Burns

Great piece of work; good start for beginning historians.
This series is THE definitive documentary on the American Civil War - it's the first of it's kind in style and content and powerfully evocative of the spirit of the time. However, there are some inconsistencies which become apparent to the attentive viewer. For example, statements made throughout the film representing North and South waiver between certainty of Northern perserverance and widespread dissension regarding Lincoln's leadership - points which are not in agreement and do not make a cohesive statement about the momentum of the Union. And as 'CenterMan' states in his review, this documentary has a decidedly 'Eastern' tilt and emphasis, probably because Burns is himself a New Englander. The Western states and territories played an extremely important part in the war both militarily and economically, but this is not touched on. To back up another of 'CenterMan's points, the armies of the West, and ESPECIALLY the Generals of the West, were utterly essential to the evolution of the war and warefare in general by the North, from an Eastern generals' stalemate to a frontiersmens' sweep. Most all of the generals who were made famous by the Civil War, both North and South, earned their stripes and first practiced their military trade serving together as field officers in the Mexican-American War twenty years prior, and in fact the North's superior use of artillery throughout the war was largely the result of methods first tried and learned by Yankee gunners and officers at Vera Cruz and Mexico City. Both Sherman and Grant, who made broad sweeping movements using entire army groups and army corps became familiar with these tactics in the wide open expanses of the Mexico and then the Indian territories, and used them to devastating effect against the flash and elan of the Confederates. Also, the political and financial importance of California, Utah, and Oregon, which supplied desperately needed cash and gold to the Union in spite of a large seccessionist element, is completely overlooked by Burns. This seems to point out a kind of misperception among many Easterners, both then and now, that the United States is centered on and revolves around their section of the country. It is a serious misperception and is a major reason the rift between North and South reached the breadth and depth that it did. Burns focuses on the traditional military and socially emotional issues of the war, which are shown anew, but he does not cover the cornerstones of demographics (the huge disparity in population growth between North and South, in birthrates and immigration) agriculture, finance, or industry, (in particular steel and the railroads), both before and during the war, which are essential to a broad understanding of the Civil War. Ultimately this documentary is an excellent introductory showpiece and is thoroughly engrossing, and should hopefully inspire students of the subject to probe deeper into it. It is an excellent piece of art and is worth seeing and owning.

---

Great but misleading
Very entertaining, a masterpiece really. However, it perpetuates the myth that the abolition of slavery was at the heart of the war. So many facts run counter to this notion. For example, until well into the war, the North made it clear that it would welcome the South back into the Union with slavery intact. When Lincoln emancipated the slaves, he specifically did so only in the rebel states, leaving out the slave states that were loyal to the Union. This clearly indicates that this was a war tactic, pretty much the same one the British employed in the Revolutionary War. (If Britain had won that war, would they have justified it later on the basis of abolishing slavery?) Then, during Reconstruction, slavery was basically reimposed in the South in all but name, and the North did nothing about it. Why? Because the North had already achieved what it really wanted: reunification. I.e., slavery was no problem as long as the country stayed together, with Washington in firm control of all of the country's territory. If you think about it, what else could Lincoln have done when the South seceded? Letting those states go would have set a lousy precedent for all of the other states and probably would have fatally weakened the country ("give us what we want, or we'll secede like the South did"). In fact, Jefferson Davis himself faced this issue in the Confederacy: how do you keep a set of states together after endorsing the idea that any state has the right to secede basically whenever it wants? It's less romantic, but it makes much more sense to think of Union at the core of the war, not slavery.

---

A great collection, drama and great narration, and some good history as well.
I watched this series when it first came out in 1990 on PBS, and was mezmerized by it, also studing U.S history at that time and having read a rather large Civil War book for a class project as well. Now on weekends our PBS station has been reruning some episodes, and it sparked me to look it up here on amazon to see what prices were, which have come down tremendously, so I bought a set. Now reflecting back 16 years later, this show is good for base history, but it also has the narration, music and organizations of a Drama. I enjoyed the battle history and seeing the maps as the battles played out, but the narration got tiresome around tape 5. And I know Shelby Foote is a smart man, and knows a lot about the civil war, but I just got so sick of his "quotes" of generals etc, no historical value in any of the quotes, and they got tiresome really quick for me. But,Overall, you can't beat this collection for civil war history, and the price is now very reasonable on VHS. 4 stars from this reviewer overall, but 5 stars as a production, and unmatched to this date by any other series on PBS, or TV in general.