Cheap Introductory Real Analysis (Book) (A. N. Kolmogorov, S. V. Fomin) Price
CHEAP-PRICE.NET ’s Cheap Price
$10.85
Here at Cheap-price.net we have Introductory Real Analysis at a terrific price. The real-time price may actually be cheaper — click “Buy Now” above to check the live price at Amazon.com.
| AUTHOR: | A. N. Kolmogorov, S. V. Fomin |
| CATEGORY: | Book |
| MANUFACTURER: | Dover Publications |
| ISBN: | 0486612260 |
| TYPE: | Algebra - General, Calculus, Functional analysis, Functions, Mathematics |
| MEDIA: | Paperback |
| # OF MEDIA: | 1 |
Related Products
Customer Reviews of Introductory Real Analysis
Strong "introduction" Overall, this book is a very strong "introduction" (I use the word grudgingly, see below) to real analysis. Topics range from the basics of set theory through metrics, operators, and Lebesgue measures and integrals. Particularly well done are the section on linear maps and operators, which include excellent generalizations as well as the usual concrete examples. The book usually includes a large number of examples and exercises on each topic which aid in the understanding of the material (though in a few instances, most notably the introduction to measure, it would have been more helpful to have examples as the theory was being developed instead of spending 20 pages getting through the theorems and only then giving a few examples).
The main problem for this book, however, is that it is located at an awkward level in terms of its assumptions of what students have seen before. Most of the material covered is that of a first analysis course, and the book is probably usually used as such. The authors, however, sometimes make assumptions that students have had exposure to some of the concepts before, claiming that "the reader has probably already encountered the familiar Heine-Borel theorem", for example. One particularly annoying case was when the authors gave as an example that the set of polynomials with rational coefficients is dense in the set of continuous functions, and left it at that. Are we supposed to have encountered Weierstrass's theorem before we take our first analysis course?
Very readable introduction by two eminent mathematicians
Years ago I used this book as a supplementary text for a course in functional analysis and measure theory. When I learned that it was being republished by Dover I immediately bought my own copy. It is a thoroughly readable book with lots of examples to illustrate concepts. The chapters on measure theory and the Lebesgue integral were exceptional. And the chapters on linear functionals and operators also very good. On the downside the introductory chapter on definitions of concepts like open and closed sets and the treatment of compactness and the Heine-Borel theorem could have been presented more clearly (I preferred Dieudonne's presentation in Foundations of Modern Analysis). I strongly recommend this book as excellent value for money.
Are all Silverman's "translations" like this one?
First, let us be precise in reviewing this book. It is NOT a book by Kolmogorov/Fomin, but rather an edited version by Silverman. So, if you read the first lines in the Editor's Preface, it states, "The present course is a freely revised and restyled version of ... the Russian original". Further down it continues, "...As in the other volumes of this series, I have not hesitated to make a number of pedagogical and mathematical improvements that occurred to me...". Read it as a big red warning flag. Alas, I would have to agree with the reader from Rio de Janeiro. I've been working through this book to rehash my knowledge of measure theory and Lebesgue integration as a prerequisite for stochastic calculus. And I've encountered many results of "mathematical improvements" that occurred to the esteemed "translator". Things are fine when topics/theorems are not too sophisticated (I guess not much room for "improvements"). Not so when you work through some more subtle proofs. Most mistakes I discovered are relatively easy to rectify (and I'm ignoring typos). But the latest is rather egregious. The proof of theorem 1 from ch. 9 (p.344-345) (about the Hahn decomposition induced on X by a signed measure F) contains such a blatant error, I am very hard pressed to believe it comes from the original. That book survived generations of math students at Moscow State, and believe me, they would go through each letter of the proofs. Astounded by such an obvious nonsense, I grabed the only other reference book on the subject I had at hand, "Measure Theory" by Halmos. The equivalent there is theorem A, sec. 29 (p.121 of Springer-Verlag edition), which has a correct proof.
For those interested in details, Silverman's proof states that positive integers are strictly ordered: k1
The best part about Kolmogorov's text is the clarity of conceptual structure of the presented subject a reader would gain, if he/she puts some effort. You would gain a thorough understanding, not just a knowledge of the subject. There is quite a difference between the two, and not that many authors succeed in delivering that.
But to gain that from Kolmogorov, I would suggest the other, "unimproved" but real, translation.