Cheap Creepshow, Vol. 3 (DVD) (Ana Clavell, James Glenn Dudelson) Price

Related Products

Customer Reviews of Creepshow, Vol. 3

Makes "Creepshow 2" look like "Creepshow"
Not nearly as bad as other people have claimed, it's still not a very good movie. I love the original, and have soft spots in my heart for "Creepshow 2", even though it's severely flawed. "Creepshow III", isn't a "Creepshow" movie. It's more like a Sci-Fi Channels original picture. Some of the stories make absolutely no sense whatsoever and are merely there to fill time. Out of the five stories, two were legitimately enjoyable - "Professor Dayton's Wife" (in an H.G. Lewis kind of way) and "The Radio" (actually had an E.C. comics ironic ending to it). This review probably sounds like it was written by a 10 year old kid, and that's how my brain feels after watching this. It's the cinematic equivalent of Taco Bell - somewhat tasty but ultimately not very good for you. <
> <
>The Good - All the stories link together. Cheesy gore effects. The Creep actually appears at the end of the movie (for all of about 2 seconds). <
> <
>The Bad - The acting. The very obvious Universal back-lot sets. The music does not fit the movie at all. Most stories make no sense and have non-endings. The TERRIBLE computer animation that introduces the first story. <
> <
>The Worst - The title. This isn't "Creepshow III". This is more like "Monsters: The Direct-to-DVD Motion Picture". <
> <
>If you were looking for a continuation of the horror comic series "Creepshow", keep looking. If you're looking to waste 99 minutes watching something that actually has a few bright spots, watch this movie. But, in the end, it comes down to two things: 1) The producers made this movie for one reason - to cash in on the brand name of the series, sell it to Warner Brothers, and earn themselves a producing credit on the upcoming remake of the original film (if it happens). 2) Warner Brothers got the rights back to a series that they shouldn't have dropped in the first place and can now make the remake of the original (or other inferior sequels).

---

WWOOOOOOOOOWWWW
When I heard this was gonna be bad I didn't assume it was going to be terrible. 100% untrue to the originals. Most of the stories just become corny. Like the other review says they just don't explain anything. To me these stories seem like the 90s versions of the Twilight Zones. And the whole blending the stories together doesn't work at all. Shows that tarentino actually has some talent when you see it done so bad. <
> <
>So heres the worst news. You HAVE to see this movie. its that bad. You just can't believe it until you see it. I don't know what else to say. if nothing else I got some laughs out of the movie. But a horror movie this is not. <
> <
>Enjoy guys

---

Very Creepy!!!
I got to see a sneak peek of Creepshow 3 at the American Film Market in 2006 and enjoyed every minute of it. I dont know why everyone is getting upset that it was not done by Steven King or George Romero? Who cares!! If you like Creepshow 1 and 2 then you will like this. The five stories are good and if you like to see blood then you will love the one with the one with the two guys and the professors wife! The movie is fun and entertaining. The Creepshow franchise is one of my favorite horror series and this new installment falls in bloody beautifully. Don't knock it if you haven't seen it!