Cheap 64MB AGP NVIDIA GEFORCE3 TI 200 (Electronics) Price
CHEAP-PRICE.NET ’s Cheap Price
Here at Cheap-price.net we have 64MB AGP NVIDIA GEFORCE3 TI 200 at a terrific price. The real-time price may actually be cheaper — click “Buy Now” above to check the live price at Amazon.com.
| CATEGORY: | Electronics |
| MANUFACTURER: | PNY |
| MEDIA: | Electronics |
| MPN: | VCGF3TI2PB |
| # OF MEDIA: | 1 |
| ACCESSORIES: | |
| UPC: | 751492212869 |
Related Products
Customer Reviews of 64MB AGP NVIDIA GEFORCE3 TI 200
HOLY COW THIS IS GOOD!!! The geForce 3 ti 200, my fave graphics card for [less]! I have one in my computer, and it kicks ...! If you're a casual gamer, this is the card for you, however, if you're a hardcore gamer, like me, you need the geForce FX 5950 Ultra, which I NEED, but anyway, this card ROX with the visulation on iTunes!
The GF3TI200 just doesn't do the trick anymore
Nor does the gf4ti4200. They both won't offer satisfying performance for nex-gen games. Even for current applications, you'll suffer a major performance hit. Not to mention the continous debate of money and more between the radeon and geforce series graphics card, the gffx was a failure. the gf4 ti was a great hit. Currently radeon and ATI's technologies own's the graphics industry, not to mention MATROX isn't doing any better than NVIDIA. They released they're new pharhelia int he summer, which wasn't bad, just had graphical and performance issues. GF3 ti200 isn't much better than the geforce 2 in performance in older games. In current games, it of course beats it out. In nex-gen games, it's hard to say. In 3Dmark2001SE, I scored 5550. Most of the tests at default settings ran averageley at 30fps. That shows that you'll be able to get a decent frame rate in most 2001-2002 dx8.1 games. (Dell Dimension Intel Processor 1100mhz, 440mb ddr, winxp home, two 18gb maxtor hds, etc...)I'll be upgrading to an all knew dell dimesion XBS, P4 3GHZ 800 bus, 1.5GB ddr, Radeon 9800, two 60gb hds, Winxp pro, (etc) this summer. That should provide what I need for next-gen games. OK so I'm loosing my talk, just don't buy this card if you want next-gen quality graphics and performance!!
So which Geforce should I buy anyway?
Familiar question? NVidia makes great chips but they definitely make it confusing when it comes to deciding which card to buy. First is a Geforce, then a Geforce2, oh wait, here's this MX version, now there's two different MX versions, now a Pro and a GTS version... oh I see an Ultra version. Oh man, now a Geforce3, now a TI200 and TI500. Are they deliberately trying to confuse us?
To sort through the insanity I went to the 3DMark website. As of the time of this writing, the results stand as follows (from fastest to slowest):
1. ATI Radeon 8500
2. NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500
3. NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200
4. NVIDIA GeForce3
5. ATI Radeon 7500
6. NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
7. NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS/Pro
Any of these cards will run anything currently out without breaking a sweat. In fact, as many reviewers have pointed out, many of the newest features available in the Geforce 3 and Radeon cards haven't even been incorporated into games (yet). Compare prices and determine which on the list is within your price range. As of the time of this writing, this PNY GF3ti200 is offered for much cheaper than the original GF3 sold by Visiontek, yet the ti200 is a faster card.
Regarding the Radeon vs. Geforce debate, it's nice to see healthy competition or else NVidia would be selling their cards for much more $$ I'm sure. That said, I'm very unhappy with ATI's unstable drivers and poor tech support. Keep that in mind when deciding on a card.
Hope this helps you in your decision.