Cheap 60 Minutes Deception (Video) Price

Related Products

Customer Reviews of 60 Minutes Deception

Seriously, Christopher Ruddy is a very solid reporter. This is well worth your time.

an endless stream of right-wing hogwash
Conspiratorial muckraking about the Vince Foster suicide: "Reporter" Christopher Ruddy beats a dead horse, attempting to raise suspicions against the Clintons for the death of their White House counsel, all the while forgetting to mention that his fictional ramblings were done in the service of right-wing gazillionaire Richard Mellon Scaife's Pittsburgh Tribune Review. If you are unaware of this man and his ilk, treat yourself to an education, as his eccentric existence is much more fertile soil for bona-fide conspiracy theories. Supporting "evidence" on this nonsensical video is supplied by other Scaife-funded wingnuts such as super-kook Reed Irvine of the misleadingly-named Accuracy in Media project. Of course, if you are of the mind that the media is liberal, than you'll probably believe anything, and this just might be up your alley, its factual shortcomings notwithstanding.

The Most Important Video of The 20th Century
Why? Because it involves the First Admendment and since any intelligent person thinking it over will register as messenger of what is likely to come (massive corruption or economic meltdown wringing out the depths of what has already occurred).

And because videos per se have only been around for 20 years, or 20% of the period.

Here is an excerpted email of mine to give others some idea of what I mean:

The video was done by William Rees-Mogg (former BBC Vice President, longtime editor of the London Times, on the board of GE [200 billion US$ cap] and several similar corporations, and a self-made British peer), James Davidson (founder in 1970's of the Taxpayer's party and an internationally famous, highly respected, and successful investment advisor/polical analyst/self-made multi-millionare) , and Joeseph Farah (journalistic awards everywhere).

snip --

The video deals with the degree, in absolute terms, of how bad things are in the area of the First Admendment

(freedom of the press), and my assessment is that it is the best of all resourses to base concrete , but limited effort, contingencies for.

cut

My goal is for some kind closure in this limited effort, and neither to twist arms nor to waste people's time with personal, subjective views.

Sometimes it pays to take a chance, so please consider it.

Best Regards,

(deleted in Asia) ** The reason I was a bit standoffish in agreeing with you is that so many people claiming controlled media do not know much and exaggerate greatly to fill in those gaps, but I was satisfied with your reply. I never have claimed to be much of a communicator B-T-W.